Deck Database

BRIDGE 14-1 IN GAMES IN TROLLBAL APOC (deck id: 84785)

60 Maindeck cards and 0 Sideboard

Legacy Tribal Wars: Underdog

Rat Control

Played by Bandit Keith in Tribal Apocalypse 10.09 (1-2)

MAINDECK (60 Cards)
20 Creatures
4 Burglar Rat
4 Pack Rat
4 Rat Colony
4 Ravenous Rats
4 Typhoid Rats
19 Spells
4 Hymn to Tourach
4 Inquisition of Kozilek
4 Liliana of the Veil
3 Witch's Vengeance
2 Shrieking Affliction
2 Thoughtseize
21 Lands
16 Swamp
3 Silent Clearing
1 Castle Locthwain
1 Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth

SIDEBOARD (0 Cards)

MATCHUPS
R1:	Loss	0-2	vs.	Nydethess	Invoking the Avatars Through Death
R2:	Bye	0 - 0	vs.	No Opponent	No Deck Found
R3:	Loss	1-2	vs.	AJ_Impy	Flashier teeth

MANA SYMBOLS
	39
Total:	39

CASTING COSTS
	x 12
	x 20
	x 7
Avg CMC:	1.87

COMMENTS

To qualify, the title means the winning decklists, from last week's Underdog+, and the normal Underdog from a month prior, combined. 8-0 + 6-1 for the same one sided non-Tribal Bridge + Liliana + Affliction shell

Last week summary:

vs AJ's Blue Wolves - Wow, what an interesting deck. Why didn't I think of the concept of combining the Wolves' flashy nature with blue permission spells? What an interesting concept and enjoyable interactive match of Tribal. This is what Tribal is all about and I had a great time playing an intense 3 games with a lot of decision-making

vs. Ensnaring Bridge (Tribe doesn't matter) - I stare at the wall as my entire deck is nullifed by one card as I die to an enchantment spell in the most uninteractive of matches, for 2 quick games in a row, against a deck that preys on creature decks with a one-card combo that's clearly not fun, fair, or balanced, and spits in the face of the concept of Tribal. Hmm, I wonder if a Tribal format has a lot of creature decks to the point where such a card would be considered oppressive and predatory? At least the unfun Scepter-Chant, LD, etc. decks weren't this good with a single auto-win card...