|
Pauper Classic Tuesdays 6.22
7 October 2014 Classic Pauper · 10 Players 10 Decks 3 rounds Swiss Top 4 playoff Hosted by longtimegone Season Leaderboard |
Torreth
Rakdos Burn
|
|
|
Metagame Breakdown | |||||||
3 Players | |||||||
Bonfá | 2-2 | Black_Pauper | Control | ||||
longtimegone | 1-2 | MBC | Control | ||||
ScionOfJustice | 2-1 | Can't be Stopped MBC | Midrange | ||||
2 Players | |||||||
flioxan | 3-2 | Pauper White Weenie | Aggro | ||||
mattingly23 | 1-2 | Pauper White Weenie | Aggro | ||||
1 Players | |||||||
paloalto36 | 0-2 | Treecycle | Control | ||||
1 Players | |||||||
Rakura | 3-1 | Burn | Aggro | ||||
1 Players | |||||||
Torreth | 4-1 | Rakdos Burn | Aggro | ||||
1 Players | |||||||
DrunkenSailor15 | 0-2 | Red Deck Wins | Aggro | ||||
1 Players | |||||||
Ja_Botts | 1-2 | DelverFiend | Aggro-Combo |
Current Standings |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pauper Classic Tuesdays 6.22 | |||||||
Rank | Player | Match Points | OMW % | PGW % | OGW % | Matches Played | Byes |
1 | Rakura | 9 | 0.556 | 0.667 | 0.601 | 4 | 0 |
2 | Bonfá | 6 | 0.666 | 0.714 | 0.444 | 4 | 0 |
3 | flioxan | 6 | 0.556 | 0.714 | 0.490 | 5 | 0 |
4 | Torreth | 6 | 0.556 | 0.667 | 0.554 | 5 | 0 |
5 | ScionOfJustice | 6 | 0.443 | 0.571 | 0.432 | 3 | 0 |
6 | mattingly23 | 3 | 0.667 | 0.375 | 0.585 | 3 | 0 |
7 | Ja_Botts | 3 | 0.554 | 0.429 | 0.429 | 3 | 0 |
8 | longtimegone | 3 | 0.443 | 0.375 | 0.414 | 3 | 0 |
9 | drunkensailor15 | 0 | 0.500 | 0.200 | 0.473 | 2 | 0 |
10 | paloalto36 | 0 | 0.500 | 0.000 | 0.571 | 2 | 0 |
Tiebreakers Explained |
|||||||
Players with the same number of match points are ranked based on three tiebreakers scores according to DCI rules. In order, they are: | |||||||
OMW % is the average percentage of matches your opponents have won. | |||||||
PGW % is the percentage of games you have won. | |||||||
OGW % is the average percentage of games your opponents have won. | |||||||
BYEs are not included when calculating standings. For example, a player with one BYE, one win, and one loss has a match win percentage of .50 rather than .66 | |||||||
When calculating standings, any opponent with less than a .33 win percentage is calculated as .33 |